Orapuh Journal | Journal of Oral & Public Health
Reducing the risks of nuclear war - the role of health professionals
PDF (English)

Comment citer

Abbasi, K., Ali, P., Barbour, V., Bibbins-Domingo, K., GM Olde Rikkert, M., Hanines, A., Helfand, I., Horton, R., Marsh, B., Mitra, A., Monteiro, C., Naumova, E. N., Rubin, E. J., Ruff, T., Peush Sahni, Tumwine, J., Yonga, P., & Zielinski, C. (2023). Reducing the risks of nuclear war - the role of health professionals. Orapuh Journal, 4(1), e1005. https://doi.org/10.4314/orapj.v4i1.5

Résumé

Any use of nuclear weapons would be catastrophic for humanity. Even a “limited” nuclear war involving only 250 of the 13 000 nuclear weapons in the world could kill 120 million people outright and cause global climate disruption leading to a nuclear famine, putting 2 billion people at risk. We now call on health professional associations to inform their members worldwide about the threat to human survival and to join with the IPPNW to support efforts to reduce the near-term risks of nuclear war.

https://doi.org/10.4314/orapj.v4i1.5
PDF (English)

Références

Science and Security Board, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . A time of unprecedented danger: it is 90 seconds to midnight. 2023 Doomsday Clock Statement. Jan 24, 2023. (https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/ (accessed June 1, 2023).

2022. Future Generations Counting on Our Commitment to Step Back from Abyss, Lift Cloud of Nuclear Annihilation for Good, Secretary-General Tells Review Conference, Press Release Aug 1, 2022 SG/SM/21394 (https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21394.doc.htm accessed 10 July 2023)

Tollefson J. Is nuclear war more likely after Russia's suspension of the New START treaty? Nature 2023; 615:

2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). May 2–27, 2005. https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2005/npttreaty.html (accessed June 2, 2023).

Mukhatzhanova 10th NPT Review Conference: why it was doomed and how it almost succeeded. Arms Control Association. October, 2022. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-10/features/10th-npt-review-conference-why-doomed-almost-succeeded (accessed June 2, 2023).

Lewis P, Williams H, Pelopidas, Aghlani S. Too close for comfort, cases of near nuclear use and options for policy. Chatham House Report. April, 2014. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2014/04/too-close-comfort-cases-near-nuclear-use-and-options-policy (accessed June 1, 2023).

Bivens M. Nuclear famine. IPPNW. August, 2022. https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ENGLISH-Nuclear-Famine-Report-Final-bleed-marks.pdf (accessed June 1, 2023).

Xia L, Robock A, Scherrer K, et al. Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection. Nat Food 2022; 3: 586–96.

Helfand I, Lewis P, Haines A. Reducing the risks of nuclear war to humanity. Lancet 2022; 399: 1097–98.

Nobel Prize Outreach AB. International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War—facts. 1985. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1985/physicians/facts/ (accessed June 1, 2023).

UN Office for Disarmament Affairs. Treaties Database. Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, status of the Treaty. 2023. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/tpnw (accessed June 1, 2023.

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. No first use: frequently asked questions. 2023. https://armscontrolcenter.org/issues/no-first-use/no-first-use-frequently-asked-questions/ (accessed June 2, 2023).

Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.