Keywords
post-cesarean rehabilitation
ERAS
postoperative care
Kinshasa
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction
Post-cesarean rehabilitation aims to promote functional recovery after surgery. In low-resource settings, these practices often remain conservative, particularly in the absence of formal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.
PurposeTo describe post-cesarean rehabilitation practices in two hospitals in Kinshasa without an ERAS protocol, in order to provide baseline data for future strategies aimed at improving postoperative care.
MethodsThis prospective descriptive study was conducted from December 2024 to February 2025 at the Kinshasa University Clinics and Ngaliema Clinic. Women aged ≥ 18 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, and who underwent cesarean delivery were included. Patients with perioperative or postoperative complications likely to prolong hospitalization were excluded. A consecutive exhaustive sampling strategy was used throughout the study period. Data were collected through direct observation and structured interviews using a standardized data collection form. Statistical analysis was descriptive.
ResultsA total of 204 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 29.9 ± 5.8 years, and 62.3% of cesarean deliveries were performed as emergencies. Spinal anesthesia was used in 98.5% of patients, with limited use of intrathecal morphine. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting using dexamethasone was performed in 5.4% of cases. Mean times to postoperative recovery milestones were 11.7 ± 5.3 hours for first oral fluid intake, 40.5 ± 12.8 hours for the first meal, 25.1 ± 10.6 hours for urinary catheter removal, 62.9 ± 28.5 hours for intravenous catheter removal, and 21.4 ± 9.0 hours for first mobilization. At 24 hours postoperatively, 78.9% of patients reported moderate to severe pain (numerical rating scale [NRS] > 3). Indicators of mother–infant bonding, such as infant carrying, were infrequent. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.1 ± 0.7 days.
ConclusionThese findings indicate underutilization of several ERAS components, particularly early feeding, early mobilization, and optimized multimodal analgesia. This highlights opportunities for the progressive implementation of ERAS strategies adapted to the local context.
References
Aka, K. E., Zoua, A. G. K., Adakanou, A. L. B. K. A., Kehi, F. S., Vodounou, R., & Horo, A. (2023). Réhabilitation améliorée post-césarienne: Résultats préliminaires d’une maternité à ressources limitées. Revue Africaine de Chirurgie, 17, 5–9.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2018). Thromboembolism in pregnancy (Practice Bulletin No. 196). Obstetrics & Gynecology, 132(1), e1–e17. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002677
Betrán, A. P., Ye, J., Moller, A.-B., Souza, J. P., & Zhang, J. (2021). Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6(6), e005671. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671
Blondel, B., Coulm, B., & Bonnet, C. (2017). Enquête nationale périnatale 2016: Les naissances et les établissements, situation et évolution depuis 2010 (Report). INSERM & DREES.
Deniou, B., Faitot, V., Bouhadjari, N., Filippova, J., & Keita, H. (2014). Réhabilitation post-césarienne. Congrès de la Société Française d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR).
Essola, L., Makao Ifoudji, A., Minkobame, U., Soami, V., Ngomas, J. F., & Pambo Moumba, T. Y. (2019). Intérêt de l’association bupivacaine-fentanyl-morphine intrathécale pour analgésie post-césarienne au CHU de Libreville. Health Sciences and Disease, 20(5), 13–17.
Guibla, I., Ilboudo, S., Yaro, I., Nana, A., Bonkoungou, P., Lankoande, M., & Traoré, I. (2021). Réhabilitation précoce post-césarienne: Pratique au CHU Souro Sanou de Bobo-Dioulasso. Sciences de la Santé et Maladies, 22(5), 63–67.
Jarraya, A., Boujelberne, M., Zghal, J., Laabidi, S., Smaoui, M., & Kolsi, K. (2016). Réhabilitation précoce post-césarienne: Enquête de pratique en Tunisie. Pan African Medical Journal, 23, 215. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.23.215.8260
Kehlet, H. (1997). Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 78(5), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/78.5.606
Kinenkinda, X., Mukuku, O., Chenge, F., Kakudji, P., Banzulu, P., Kakoma, J. B., & Kizonde, S. (2017). Césarienne à Lubumbashi: Fréquence, indications et mortalité maternelle et périnatale. Pan African Medical Journal, 27, 132. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.27.132.11610
Kitil, G. W., Birgoda, G. T., Walle, A. D., Dinagde, D. D., Feyisa, G. T., Gebrehiwot, Y. A., & Degefa, B. D. (2024). Length of stay and determinants of early discharge and extended stay after cesarean delivery in a resource-limited setting: Southern Ethiopia. Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 5, 1346720. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1346720
Laronche, A., Popescu, L., & Benhamou, D. (2017). An enhanced recovery programme after caesarean delivery increases maternal satisfaction and improves maternal–neonatal bonding: A case-control study. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 210, 212–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.03.036
Macones, G. A., Caughey, A. B., Wood, S. L., Wrench, I. J., Huang, J., Norman, M., Pettersson, K., Fawcett, W. J., Shalabi, M. M., Metcalfe, A., Gramlich, L., Nelson, G., & Wilson, R. D. (2019). Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (Part 3). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 221(3), 247.e1–247.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.035
Mbongo, J. A., Butoyi, J. M., Papandi-Ikourou, A., & Iloki, L. H. (2016). Césarienne en urgence au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brazzaville. Sciences de la Santé et Maladies, 17(1), 1–6.
Mbungu, M. R., Ntela, M. J., & Kahindo, M. P. (2017). Fréquence des césariennes selon la classification de Robson dans 3 maternités de Kinshasa, République Démocratique du Congo. Annales Africaines de Médecine, 10(2), 1–9.
Pinho, B., & Costa, A. (2024). Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines implementation in cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 292, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.12.004
Rafanomezantsoa, T. A., Rakotondrainibe, A., Rasoamampianina, L. E., Andrianirina, M., Rajaonera, A., Rakotoarison, R. C. N., & Andrianampanalinarivo, H. E. (2016). Réhabilitation précoce après césarienne au CHU de Gynécologie Obstétrique Befelatanana. Revue Anesthésie-Réanimation, 8(1), 37–40.
Roofthooft, E., Joshi, G. P., Rawal, N., Van de Velde, M., & PROSPECT Working Group. (2021). PROSPECT guideline for elective cesarean section: Updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Anaesthesia, 76(5), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15308
Roy, S., & Montgomery Irvine, I. (2018). Caesarean section rate and postnatal bed occupancy: A retrospective study replacing assumptions with evidence. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 760. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3488-x
Sima Ole, B., Obame, R., Bang Ntamack, J., Massai, S., Nzogue Nguema, P., & Mayi Tsonga, S. (2017). Durée de séjour réduite après césarienne au Gabon. Bulletin Médical d’Owendo, 15(42), 24–30.
Souza, J. P., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Lumbiganon, P., Loapaiboon, M., Carroli, G., Fawole, B., Ruyan, P., & WHO Global Survey Group. (2010). Caesarean section without medical indication is associated with increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: The 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Medicine, 8, 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-71
Talhaoğlu, D., & Ceyhan, O. (2024). ERAS protocol applications in cesarean surgery. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 41(1), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.46350/jecm.41.1.185
Walker, M., Sobel, M., Siddiqi, N., Carvalho, J. C. A., Jahan, N., Santini, S., Watts, N., Dart, K., Wang, S., Huszti, E., & Thomas, J. (2025). Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery for caesarean delivery: A quality improvement initiative. BMJ Open Quality, 14(3), e003391. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003391
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.