Orapuh Journal | Journal of Oral & Public Health
ACR BI-RADS classification in the diagnostic management of suspicious breast lesions: A multicentre study (2014–2025), Democratic Republic of the Congo
Orap J, 7(5), 2026
PDF

Keywords

Breast cancer
BI-RADS
breast imaging
mammography
ultrasonography
diagnostic accuracy
histopathology
Democratic Republic of the Congo

How to Cite

Mangaza Numbi, N., IYOTO, D., Mwale, N. M., Kalanga Nyemabo, R., Aundu Molua, A., & Mvila Luyeye, G. (2026). ACR BI-RADS classification in the diagnostic management of suspicious breast lesions: A multicentre study (2014–2025), Democratic Republic of the Congo. Orapuh Journal, 7(5), e1446. https://doi.org/10.4314/orapj.v7i5.46

Abstract

Introduction

Breast cancer remains a major global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR BI-RADS) standardises breast imaging interpretation and guides clinical decision-making. However, evidence on its diagnostic performance in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is limited.

Purpose

To assess the diagnostic and clinical contribution of BI-RADS in the management of suspicious breast lesions in the DRC using radiological–histopathological correlation.

Methods

A retrospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study was conducted across five hospitals in the DRC (2014–2025). Patients with BI-RADS-classified breast imaging and histopathological confirmation were included. BI-RADS 4–5 were considered positive for malignancy, while BI-RADS 2–3 were negative or low suspicion. Histopathology served as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, Youden’s index, and AUC. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with malignancy.

Results

Of 3,447 patients, 3,046 BI-RADS 1 cases were excluded due to lack of histological indication, leaving 401 patients for analysis. Malignancy was confirmed in 66.6% (267/401). Mean age was 49.5 ± 13.9 years, and 96.5% presented with a palpable mass. Mammography showed a sensitivity of 93.3%, specificity of 70.9%, and AUC of 0.857. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 88.0%, specificity of 75.4%, and AUC of 0.840. Age ≥70 years, multiparity, and advanced clinical stage were independently associated with malignancy, while physical activity was protective.

Conclusion

BI-RADS demonstrates good diagnostic performance for suspicious breast lesions in the DRC. Mammography is more sensitive, while ultrasound is more specific, supporting their complementary use. Strengthening radiologist training, standardised reporting, and access to biopsy and pathology services is essential for optimising BI-RADS effectiveness in low-resource settings.

https://doi.org/10.4314/orapj.v7i5.46
PDF

References

American College of Radiology. (2025). ACR BI-RADS® atlas: Breast imaging reporting and data system (v2025). https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/BI-RADS

Anyigba, C. A., Awandare, G. A., & Paemka, L. (2021). Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: The current state and uncertain future. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 246(12), 1377–1387. https://doi.org/10.1177/15353702211006047

Berg, W. A., Gutierrez, L., NessAiver, M. S., Carter, W. B., Bhargavan, M., Lewis, R. S., & Ioffe, O. B. (2004). Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, ultrasound, and MR imaging. Radiology, 233(3), 830–849. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031484

Bray, F., Laversanne, M., Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Soerjomataram, I., & Jemal, A. (2024). Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 74(3), 229–263. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834

Colditz, G. A., & Bohlke, K. (2014). Priorities for the primary prevention of breast cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21225

D’Orsi, C. J., Sickles, E. A., Mendelson, E. B., & Morris, E. A. (2013). ACR BI-RADS atlas: Breast imaging reporting and data system (5th ed.). American College of Radiology.

Dromain, C., Balleyguier, C., Adler, G., Garbay, J.-R., & Delaloge, S. (2019). Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A review of current evidence. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 100(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2018.10.005

Elbachiri, M., Fatima, S., Bouchbika, Z., Benchakroun, N., Jouhadi, H., & Tawfiq, N. (2017). Cancer du sein chez l’homme: À propos de 40 cas et revue de la littérature. The Pan African Medical Journal, 28, 287. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.28.287.8299

Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., Lam, F., Colombet, M., Mery, L., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., Soerjomataram, I., & Bray, F. (2024). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer. https://gco.iarc.fr/today

Friedenreich, C. M., Neilson, H. K., & Lynch, B. M. (2016). State of the evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 108(1), djv216. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv216

Ghaemian, N., et al. (2021). Accuracy of mammography and ultrasonography and their BI-RADS in detection of breast malignancy. Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, 12(4), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.22088/cjim.12.4.573

Haute Autorité de Santé. (2019). Évaluation de la performance et de la place de la mammographie par tomosynthèse dans le dépistage organisé du cancer du sein. HAS.

Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387

Jedy-Agba, E., McCormack, V., Adebamowo, C., & dos-Santos-Silva, I. (2020). A review of breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Medicine, 18, 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01652-8

Kantelhardt, E. J., Zerche, P., Mathewos, A., Trocchi, P., Addissie, A., Aynalem, A., Wondemagegnehu, T., Ersumo, T., Reeler, A., Yonas, B., Gemechu, T., Jemal, A., Thomssen, C., Stang, A., & Eberle, A. (2014). Breast cancer survival in Ethiopia: A cohort study of 1,070 women. Breast Care, 9(3), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365640

Kolb, T. M., Lichy, J., & Newhouse, J. H. (2002). Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US. Radiology, 225(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2251011667

Lehman, C. D., Arao, R. F., Sprague, B. L., et al. (2015). National performance benchmarks for screening mammography. JAMA, 314(15), 1604–1615. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12783

Luyeye, M., Mukuku, O., et al. (2019). Breast cancer in Kinshasa: Epidemiological profile. BMC Cancer, 19, 123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5325-4

Mubuuke, A. G., et al. (2023). Comparative accuracy of sonography, mammography and BI-RADS characterization of breast masses among adult women at Mulago Hospital, Uganda. Journal of Global Health Reports, 7, e2023037. https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.75139

Pace, L. E., & Shulman, L. N. (2015). Breast cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities to reduce mortality. The Oncologist, 21(6), 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0429

Sah, A. K., Yadav, P., Kumari, S., et al. (2025). Male breast cancer: Epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular mechanisms, therapeutics, and future perspectives. Oncology Research, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.32604/or.2025.065171

Sardanelli, F., Aase, H. S., Álvarez, M., et al. (2017). BI-RADS system: Strengths and limitations. European Radiology, 27(5), 1963–1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4611-8

Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S., & Jemal, A. (2023). Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 73(1), 17–48. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21763

Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3), 209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660

Tabár, L., Chen, T. H.-H., & Yen, A. M.-F. (2020). Early detection of breast cancer rectifies inequality of breast cancer outcomes. Journal of Medical Screening, 27(1), 1–5.

World Cancer Research Fund. (2018). Diet, nutrition, physical activity and breast cancer. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer

World Health Organization. (2023). Global breast cancer initiative implementation framework: Assessing, strengthening and scaling up of services for early detection and management of breast cancer. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240065987

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Numbi, N. M., Iyoto, D M., Mwale, N. M., Nyemabo, R. K., Molua, A. A., Luyeye, G. M.